[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151008144711.GA8072@deathstar>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:47:11 -0500
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fionn Cleary <clearyf@....ie>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: McSPI hangs with cs_change after "Switch driver to use
transfer_one" change
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:54:50PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm in a use case where I use cs_change on McSPI channel 3 on a single transfer Full-Duplex message, then I transfer a single full duplex message without cs_change on channel 1.
>
> Here is a better representation :
> -- 1 transfer message cs_change=1
> cs3 : set_cs(0)
> cs3 : full-duplex transfer
> cs3 : transfer ok
> -- 1 transfer message cs_change=1
> cs3 : set_cs(0)
> cs3 : full-duplex transfer
> cs3 : transfer ok
> ...
> -- 1 transfer message cs_change=1
> cs3 : set_cs(0)
> cs3 : full-duplex transfer
> cs3 : transfer ok
> -- 1 transfer message cs_change=1
> cs1 : set_cs(0)
Looks like bus contention here.
> cs1 : full-duplex transfer
> cs1 : RXS timed out
> cs1 : set_cs(1)
>
> Then "RXS timed out" on each non-cs3 transfers.
>
> The previous behavior of cs_change was :
> - between transfers, unassert CS and re-assert-it for the following transfer
> - between messages, unassert CS
>
> The new behaviour inherited from the SPI core spi_transfer_one_message function :
> - between transfers, unassert CS and re-assert-it for the following transfer
> - between messages, leave CS asserted
>
> We tried disabling the DMA, and the FIFO, but the behavior was actually the same, only reverting back before the "Switch driver to use transfer_one" fixed the issue.
>
> Then actually disabling the cs_change corrected the issue. It may be why the original driver ignored the "leave it on after last xfer" hint.
>
> The problem is : how can we disable this hint since it is managed in SPI core spi_transfer_one_message ?
It seems the core driver assumes that the driver is smart enough to deselect
the previous chip select instead of doing it explicitly.
>
> A solution will be to track down the current asserted CS and unassert it them when the active channel changes.
>
> Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists