[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444118413.3579.46.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 15:43:59 +0000
From: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patrice.chotard@...com" <patrice.chotard@...com>,
"maxime.coquelin@...com" <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
"srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com" <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
"peter.griffin@...aro.org" <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
CC: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"ludovic.barre@...com" <ludovic.barre@...com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA
driver header file
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 15:14 +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> +#define FDMA_ID_OFST 0x00000
> +#define FDMA_VER_OFST 0x00004
> > +
> +#define FDMA_EN_OFST 0x00008
Why cant these be BIT() to maintain consistency?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists