[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151008162316.GA5833@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:23:16 -0400
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"r.baldyga@...sung.com" <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
"sojka@...ica.cz" <sojka@...ica.cz>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
"sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [Device-mainlining] [PATCH v2 2/3] gadget: Introduce the usb
charger framework
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:50:31PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On 08/16/2015 08:03 PM, Baolin Wang via device-mainlining wrote:
> > > On 14 August 2015 at 23:27, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:47:45PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > >>> + *
> > >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > >>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > >>> + * (at your option) any later version.
> > >>
> > >> I have to ask, do you really mean "any later version"?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think I did not get your point, could you explain it detailedly?
> >
> > The full kernel is licensed under v2 of the GPL only, not "any later version".
> > See the second paragraph at the top of the COPYING file in the root directory
> > of the kernel source tree. There are differences on individual files, but
> > having this file allow "any later version" makes it different from much of
> > rest of the kernel.
> >
> > Unless you have a specific reason to allow greater-than-V2 GPL licensing on this
> > file, you should change the licensing clause. The following wording appears
> > to be pretty popular:
> >
> > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> > * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>
> Please, keep it V2 or later, if you can. It makes sharing code with U-Boot (for
> example) easier.
>
> There's long tradition of "V2 or later" code in the kernel.
And there's even longer "v2 only" tradition as well. It's up to the
person / company submitting the code to pick the license for it, let
them make the decision please.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists