linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] bpf: add unprivileged bpf tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5616AE27.6060108@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:55:51 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] bpf: add unprivileged bpf tests

On 10/8/15 10:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>   samples/bpf/libbpf.h        |    8 +
>> >  samples/bpf/test_verifier.c |  357 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> Instead of living in samples/ could these be moved and hooked up to
> tools/testing/selftests/ instead?

as a follow up patch. yes. of course.
along with test_maps.
Fengguang's todo already includes adding test_bpf.ko to 0-day buildbot.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/