[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11583587.xphxbMQ7TN@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:40:19 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux@....linux.org.uk, vinod.koul@...el.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Document the STM32 DMA bindings
On Thursday 08 October 2015 22:25:50 M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> >
> > How do you know which channels are available for memory-to-memory
> > transfers?
> For memory-to-memory transfer we don't need any channel/request combination.
> We look for any available channel in the channel list to execute our transfer.
> So, as often as possible, we expect that a peripheral release his
> channel after transfering data.
> In that way, we always should have at least one channel available for
> that kind of transfer.
>
Ah, got it. So the use of virtual channels in this driver makes MEM2MEM
transfers work, but is otherwise not required.
Thanks for the clarification.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists