[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1444349547.538684152@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:12:27 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho deMelo" <acme@...nel.org>, eranian@...gle.com,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 013/107] perf: Fix fasync handling on inherited events
3.2.72-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit fed66e2cdd4f127a43fd11b8d92a99bdd429528c upstream.
Vince reported that the fasync signal stuff doesn't work proper for
inherited events. So fix that.
Installing fasync allocates memory and sets filp->f_flags |= FASYNC,
which upon the demise of the file descriptor ensures the allocation is
freed and state is updated.
Now for perf, we can have the events stick around for a while after the
original FD is dead because of references from child events. So we
cannot copy the fasync pointer around. We can however consistently use
the parent's fasync, as that will be updated.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho deMelo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: eranian@...gle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434011521.1495.71.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3942,12 +3942,20 @@ static const struct file_operations perf
* to user-space before waking everybody up.
*/
+static inline struct fasync_struct **perf_event_fasync(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ /* only the parent has fasync state */
+ if (event->parent)
+ event = event->parent;
+ return &event->fasync;
+}
+
void perf_event_wakeup(struct perf_event *event)
{
ring_buffer_wakeup(event);
if (event->pending_kill) {
- kill_fasync(&event->fasync, SIGIO, event->pending_kill);
+ kill_fasync(perf_event_fasync(event), SIGIO, event->pending_kill);
event->pending_kill = 0;
}
}
@@ -4924,7 +4932,7 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
else
perf_event_output(event, data, regs);
- if (event->fasync && event->pending_kill) {
+ if (*perf_event_fasync(event) && event->pending_kill) {
event->pending_wakeup = 1;
irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists