[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1444349548.908746454@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:12:28 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David Daney" <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 052/107] of/address: Don't loop forever in
of_find_matching_node_by_address().
3.2.72-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
commit 3a496b00b6f90c41bd21a410871dfc97d4f3c7ab upstream.
If the internal call to of_address_to_resource() fails, we end up
looping forever in of_find_matching_node_by_address(). This can be
caused by a defective device tree, or calling with an incorrect
matches argument.
Fix by calling of_find_matching_node() unconditionally at the end of
the loop.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/of/address.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/of/address.c
+++ b/drivers/of/address.c
@@ -604,10 +604,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_nod
struct resource res;
while (dn) {
- if (of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res))
- continue;
- if (res.start == base_address)
+ if (!of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res) &&
+ res.start == base_address)
return dn;
+
dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists