[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56174371.8080107@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 21:32:49 -0700
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
To: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
CC: "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in
btrfs
On 10/08/2015 05:35 PM, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> btrfs_bio_counter_sub() seems to be missing a memory barrier which might
> cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a wake_up as
> in the following figure.
>
> btrfs_bio_counter_sub btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> if (waitqueue_active(&fs_info->replace_wait))
> /* The CPU might reorder the test for
> the waitqueue up here, before
> prior writes complete */
> /* wait_event */
> /* __wait_event */
> /* ___wait_event */
> long __int = prepare_to_wait_event(&wq,
> &__wait, state);
> if (!percpu_counter_sum(&fs_info->bio_counter))
> percpu_counter_sub(&fs_info->bio_counter,
> amount);
> schedule()
percpu_counter_sub can't be reordered, in its most basic form it does
preempt_disable/enable which in its most basic form does barrier(). Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists