linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] leds: core: Drivers shouldn't enforce SYNC/ASYNC brightness setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151009070202.GA27183@amd>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:02:02 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andrew@...n.ch, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] leds: core: Drivers shouldn't enforce SYNC/ASYNC
 brightness setting

On Fri 2015-10-09 08:28:44, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 05:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >On Mon 2015-09-21 16:29:26, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >>This patch removes SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC and SET_BRIGHTNESS flags.
> 
> s/SET_BRIGHTNESS/SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC/
> 
> >>led_set_brightness now calls led_set_brightness_nosleep instead of
> >>choosing between sync and async op basing on the flags defined by the
> >>driver.
> >
> >Are those flags unused in the version of kernel you are patching?
> 
> The flags are used until this patch.

Hmm. I seen you removing the definitions, but not removing any
users. I guess I missed something.

Best regards,								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/