linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: seq_oss: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in snd-seq-oss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hh9m0lc0r.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:46:44 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	"Kosuke Tatsukawa" <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	"Jie Yang" <yang.jie@...el.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>,
	"Markus Elfring" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: seq_oss: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in snd-seq-oss

On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 02:35:54 +0200,
Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> 
> snd_seq_oss_readq_put_event() seems to be missing a memory barrier which
> might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a
> wake_up as in the following figure.
> 
>     snd_seq_oss_readq_put_event		    snd_seq_oss_readq_wait
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 					/* wait_event_interruptible_timeout */
> 					 /* __wait_event_interruptible_timeout */
> 					  /* ___wait_event */
> 					  for (;;) {									 prepare_to_wait_event(&wq, &__wait,
> 					    state);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
> if (waitqueue_active(&q->midi_sleep))
> /* The CPU might reorder the test for
>    the waitqueue up here, before
>    prior writes complete */
> 					  if ((q->qlen>0 || q->head==q->tail)
> 					  ...
> 					  __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret)
> if (q->qlen >= q->maxlen - 1) {
> memcpy(&q->q[q->tail], ev, sizeof(*ev));
> q->tail = (q->tail + 1) % q->maxlen;
> q->qlen++;
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are two other place in sound/core/seq/oss/ which have similar
> code.  The attached patch removes the call to waitqueue_active() leaving
> just wake_up() behind.  This fixes the problem because the call to
> spin_lock_irqsave() in wake_up() will be an ACQUIRE operation.
> 
> I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
> for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
> preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
> issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c  (Details about the original issue can be
> found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>

Thanks, applied now.


Takashi

> ---
>  sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_readq.c  |    6 ++----
>  sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_writeq.c |    4 +---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_readq.c b/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_readq.c
> index ccd8935..046cb58 100644
> --- a/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_readq.c
> +++ b/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_readq.c
> @@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ snd_seq_oss_readq_clear(struct seq_oss_readq *q)
>  		q->head = q->tail = 0;
>  	}
>  	/* if someone sleeping, wake'em up */
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&q->midi_sleep))
> -		wake_up(&q->midi_sleep);
> +	wake_up(&q->midi_sleep);
>  	q->input_time = (unsigned long)-1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -138,8 +137,7 @@ snd_seq_oss_readq_put_event(struct seq_oss_readq *q, union evrec *ev)
>  	q->qlen++;
>  
>  	/* wake up sleeper */
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&q->midi_sleep))
> -		wake_up(&q->midi_sleep);
> +	wake_up(&q->midi_sleep);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
>  
> diff --git a/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_writeq.c b/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_writeq.c
> index d50338b..1f6788a 100644
> --- a/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_writeq.c
> +++ b/sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_writeq.c
> @@ -138,9 +138,7 @@ snd_seq_oss_writeq_wakeup(struct seq_oss_writeq *q, abstime_t time)
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->sync_lock, flags);
>  	q->sync_time = time;
>  	q->sync_event_put = 0;
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&q->sync_sleep)) {
> -		wake_up(&q->sync_sleep);
> -	}
> +	wake_up(&q->sync_sleep);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->sync_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/