linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <134741266.796671444378655653.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas03a>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:17:37 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@...sung.com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	AKHILESH KUMAR <akhilesh.k@...sung.com>,
	Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@...sung.com>,
	PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ

  
>> This looks correct now. A few more points though:
>> 
>> * My first thought would have been to do this by first defining the
>>   two symbols before the #include, and then adding an #ifdef in
>>   the generic file. Both approaches work though, any other opinions
>>   on this?

>That's what I was thinking as well. Maybe with a single #ifndef
>MINSIGSTKSZ to cover both macros.

I am sharing another patch which adds both macro in arm64/.../signal.h with new values and put a check with #ifndef in uapi/.../signal.h.