lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:17:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@...sung.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, AKHILESH KUMAR <akhilesh.k@...sung.com>, Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@...sung.com>, PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ >> This looks correct now. A few more points though: >> >> * My first thought would have been to do this by first defining the >> two symbols before the #include, and then adding an #ifdef in >> the generic file. Both approaches work though, any other opinions >> on this? >That's what I was thinking as well. Maybe with a single #ifndef >MINSIGSTKSZ to cover both macros. I am sharing another patch which adds both macro in arm64/.../signal.h with new values and put a check with #ifndef in uapi/.../signal.h.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists