linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: enable spi buses on LS and HS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56177DEE.1070405@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:42:22 +0100
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org
CC:	jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: enable spi buses on LS and
 HS



On 08/10/15 19:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 04:19 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> This patch enables spi buses on low speed and high speed expansion
>> connectors on DB410C
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi
>> index 3581272..d872654 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtsi
>> @@ -92,11 +92,21 @@
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   };
>>
>> +&blsp_spi3 {
>> +	/* On High speed expansion */
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>>   &blsp_i2c4 {
>>   	/* On High speed expansion */
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   };
>>
>> +&blsp_spi5 {
>> +	/* On Low speed expansion */
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>>   &blsp_i2c6 {
>>   	/* On Low speed expansion */
>>   	status = "okay";
>
> We've been using absolute nodes to mark device nodes as status = "okay".
> Can we keep doing that here please?

Sure, I will re-spin a new version.

--srini
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/