| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:50:11 +0300 From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com> To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com> Cc: mm@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, operations@...eground.com, tytso@....edu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: Fix possible deadlock with local interrupts disabled and page-draining IPI On 10/09/2015 11:41 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > On Oct 8, 2015 18:31, "Nikolay Borisov" <kernel@...p.com> wrote: >> >> Currently when bios are being finished in ext4_finish_bio this is done by >> first disabling interrupts and then acquiring a bit_spin_lock. > ... >> >> To fix the situation this patch changes the order in which the >> bit_spin_lock and interrupts disabling occcurs. The exepected >> effect is that even if a core is spinning on the bitlock it will >> have its interrupts enabled, thus being able to respond to IPIs. > > Are you sure this spin lock is never taken from interrupt context? Good point. I think indeed this fix is wrong as this lock is actually taken from soft irq context as evident from this thread, which prompted me to write the patch in the first place: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2056730 > If it does an interrupt occurring after the lock is taken and before > interrupts are disabled can deadlock . > > Gilad > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists