linux-kernel - pidns: Make pid accounting and pid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56179700.3010703@mogujie.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:29:20 +0800
From:	Zhang Haoyu <yuzhou@...ujie.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:	xemul@...allels.com
Subject: pidns: Make pid accounting and pid_max per namespace

I started multiple docker containers in centos6.6(linux-2.6.32-504.16.2),
and there's one bad program was running in one container.
This program produced many child threads continuously without free, so more and
more pid numbers were consumed by this program, until hitting the pix_max limit (32768
default in my system ).

What's worse is that containers and host share the pid numbers resource, so new program
cannot be produced any more in host and other containers.

And, I clone the upstream kernel source from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
This problem is still there, I'm not sure.

IMO, we should isolate the pid accounting and pid_max between pid namespaces,
and make them per pidns.
Below post had request for making pid_max per pidns.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1108167/focus=1111210

Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/