linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] can: at91: remove at91_can

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151009105100.GB2666@piout.net>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:51:00 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: at91: remove at91_can_data

On 09/10/2015 at 12:07:40 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote :
> On 10/08/2015 04:56 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > struct at91_can_data was used to pass a callback to the driver, allowing it
> > to switch the transceiver on and off. As all at91 boards are now using DT,
> > this is not used anymore, remove that structure.
> 
> One board was obviously not converted properly to DT. As I don't have to
> board to test, I'll apply this patch.
> 

Yeah, we dropped a few mostly unused and untested features when
switching to DT. I have the board but I currently don't have any way to
test CAN properly, I'll submit a patch adding regulator support for the
transceiver once it has been tested.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/