[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5617B12D.2070001@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:21:01 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: Jacob Tanenbaum <jtanenba@...hat.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
CC: trenn@...e.com, shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
rafael.j.wysock@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpupower reporting uninitialized values for offline
cpus
On 10/01/2015 03:09 PM, Jacob Tanenbaum wrote:
> cpupower monitor reports uninitialized values for offline cpus
>
> [root@...dl980g7-02 linux]# cpupower monitor
> ...
> 5472| 0| 1|******|******|******|******||******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline
> 10567| 0| 159|******|******|******|******||******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline
> 1661206560|859272560| 150|******|******|******|******||******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline
> 1661206560|943093104| 140|******|******|******|******||******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline
>
> because of this cpupower also holds the incorrect value for the number
> of physical packages in the machine
>
> Changed cpupower to initialize the values of an offline cpu's socket and
> core to -1, warn the user that one or more cpus is/are
> offline and not print statistics for offline cpus.
>
> Thomas Renninger suggested fixing the issue by checking for the
> existence of the topology files which the code already does, so I
> decided to use a check on if the cpu was online.
Thomas, any comment?
Looks good to me. The description could be cleaned up a bit but I'll let the
maintainer decide if they want a new one.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists