[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009125507.GA7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:55:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in
virt/kvm/async_pf.c
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:21:55PM +0000, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> + * Memory barrier is required here to make sure change to
> + * vcpu->async_pf.done is visible from other CPUs. This memory
> + * barrier pairs with prepare_to_wait's set_current_state()
That is not how memory barriers work; they don't 'make visible'. They
simply ensure order between operations.
X = Y = 0
CPU0 CPU1
[S] X=1 [S] Y=1
MB MB
[L] y=Y [L] x=X
assert(x || y)
The issue of the memory barrier does not mean the store is visible, it
merely means that the load _must_ happen after the store (in the above
scenario).
This gives a guarantee that not both x and y can be 0. Because either
being 0, means the other has not yet executed and must therefore observe
your store.
Nothing more, nothing less.
So your comment is misleading at best.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists