[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009163336.GM10631@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:33:36 -0500
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc: michal.simek@...inx.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com,
atull@...nsource.altera.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fpga manager: Adding FPGA Manager support for Xilinx
Zynq 7000
Hey Moritz-
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:45:07AM +0200, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> This commit adds FPGA Manager support for the Xilinx Zynq chip.
> The code heavily borrows from the xdevcfg driver in Xilinx'
> vendor tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
[..]
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c
[..]
> +static irqreturn_t zynq_fpga_isr(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + u32 intr_status;
> + struct zynq_fpga_priv *priv = data;
> +
> + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
I'm confused about the locking here. You have this lock, but it's only
used in the isr. It's claimed purpose is to protect 'error', but that
clearly isn't happening.
> + intr_status = zynq_fpga_read(priv, INT_STS_OFFSET);
> +
> + if (!intr_status) {
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, INT_STS_OFFSET, intr_status);
> +
> + if ((intr_status & IXR_D_P_DONE_MASK) == IXR_D_P_DONE_MASK)
> + complete(&priv->dma_done);
Just so I understand, wouldn't you also want to complete() in the error
case, too?
> + if ((intr_status & IXR_ERROR_FLAGS_MASK) ==
> + IXR_ERROR_FLAGS_MASK) {
> + priv->error = true;
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "%s dma error\n", __func__);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynq_fpga_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct zynq_fpga_priv *priv;
> + u32 ctrl, status;
> + int err;
> +
> + priv = mgr->priv;
> +
> + err = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* only reset if we're not doing partial reconfig */
> + if (!(flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG)) {
> + /* assert AXI interface resets */
> + regmap_write(priv->slcr, SLCR_FPGA_RST_CTRL_OFFSET,
> + FPGA_RST_ALL_MASK);
> +
> + /* disable level shifters */
> + regmap_write(priv->slcr, SLCR_LVL_SHFTR_EN_OFFSET,
> + LVL_SHFTR_DISABLE_ALL_MASK);
> + /* enable output level shifters */
> + regmap_write(priv->slcr, SLCR_LVL_SHFTR_EN_OFFSET,
> + LVL_SHFTR_ENABLE_PS_TO_PL);
> +
> + /* create a rising edge on PCFG_INIT. PCFG_INIT follows
> + * PCFG_PROG_B, so we need to poll it after setting PCFG_PROG_B
> + * to make sure the rising edge actually happens
> + */
> + ctrl = zynq_fpga_read(priv, CTRL_OFFSET);
> + ctrl |= CTRL_PCFG_PROG_B_MASK;
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, CTRL_OFFSET, ctrl);
> +
> + zynq_fpga_poll_timeout(priv, STATUS_OFFSET, status, status &
> + STATUS_PCFG_INIT_MASK, 20, 0);
And if we timeout?
> +
> + ctrl = zynq_fpga_read(priv, CTRL_OFFSET);
> + ctrl &= ~CTRL_PCFG_PROG_B_MASK;
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, CTRL_OFFSET, ctrl);
> +
> + zynq_fpga_poll_timeout(priv, STATUS_OFFSET, status, !(status &
> + STATUS_PCFG_INIT_MASK), 20, 0);
And if we timeout?
> +
> + ctrl = zynq_fpga_read(priv, CTRL_OFFSET);
> + ctrl |= CTRL_PCFG_PROG_B_MASK;
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, CTRL_OFFSET, ctrl);
> +
> + zynq_fpga_poll_timeout(priv, STATUS_OFFSET, status, status &
> + STATUS_PCFG_INIT_MASK, 20, 0);
And if we timeout?
> + }
> +
> + clk_disable(priv->clk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynq_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct zynq_fpga_priv *priv;
> + int err;
> + char *kbuf;
> + size_t i, in_count;
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> + u32 transfer_length = 0;
> + bool endian_swap = false;
> +
> + in_count = count;
> + priv = mgr->priv;
> +
> + kbuf = dma_alloc_coherent(priv->dev, count, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!kbuf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(kbuf, buf, count);
> +
> + /* look for the sync word */
> + for (i = 0; i < count - 4; i++) {
> + if (memcmp(kbuf + i, "\x66\x55\x99\xAA", 4) == 0) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Found normal sync word\n");
> + endian_swap = false;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (memcmp(kbuf + i, "\xAA\x99\x55\x66", 4) == 0) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Found swapped sync word\n");
> + endian_swap = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
How much control do we have over mandating the format of firmware at
this point? It'd be swell if we could just mandate a specific
endianness, and leave this munging to usermode.
> + /* remove the header, align the data on word boundary */
> + if (i != count - 4) {
> + count -= i;
> + memmove(kbuf, kbuf + i, count);
> + }
> +
> + /* fixup endianness of the data */
> + if (endian_swap) {
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i += 4) {
Aren't we writing beyond the buffer, if count isn't word-aligned?
> + u32 *p = (u32 *)&kbuf[i];
> + *p = swab32(*p);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* enable clock */
> + err = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, INT_STS_OFFSET, IXR_ALL_MASK);
> +
> + /* enable DMA and error IRQs */
> + zynq_fpga_unmask_irqs(priv);
> +
> + priv->error = false;
> +
> + /* the +1 in the src addr is used to hold off on DMA_DONE IRQ */
> + /* until both AXI and PCAP are done */
> + if (count < PAGE_SIZE)
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, DMA_SRC_ADDR_OFFSET, (u32)(dma_addr + 1));
> + else
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, DMA_SRC_ADDR_OFFSET, (u32)(dma_addr));
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, DMA_DEST_ADDR_OFFSET, (u32)DMA_INVALID_ADDRESS);
> +
> + /* convert #bytes to #words */
> + transfer_length = (count + 3) / 4;
> +
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, DMA_SRC_LEN_OFFSET, transfer_length);
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, DMA_DEST_LEN_OFFSET, 0);
> +
> + wait_for_completion_interruptible(&priv->dma_done);
And if we're interrupted?
> + if (priv->error) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Error configuring FPGA.\n");
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + /* disable DMA and error IRQs */
> + zynq_fpga_mask_irqs(priv);
> +
> + clk_disable(priv->clk);
> +
> +out_free:
> + dma_free_coherent(priv->dev, in_count, kbuf, dma_addr);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
[..]
> +static int zynq_fpga_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct zynq_fpga_priv *priv;
> + struct resource *res;
> + u32 ctrl_reg;
> + int ret;
> +
[..]
> + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (priv->irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No IRQ available");
> + return priv->irq;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, priv->irq, zynq_fpga_isr, 0,
> + dev_name(dev), priv);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
This is the wrong check for error in this case. You should check 'ret'
being non-zero.
> + return ret;
> +
> + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref_clk");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "input clock not found\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* unlock the device */
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, UNLOCK_OFFSET, UNLOCK_MASK);
> +
> + /* set configuration register with following options:
> + * - reset FPGA
> + * - enable PCAP interface for partial reconfig
> + * - set throughput for maximum speed
> + * - set CPU in user mode
> + */
> + ctrl_reg = zynq_fpga_read(priv, CTRL_OFFSET);
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, CTRL_OFFSET, (CTRL_PCFG_PROG_B_MASK |
> + CTRL_PCAP_PR_MASK | CTRL_PCAP_MODE_MASK | ctrl_reg));
> +
> + /* ensure internal PCAP loopback is disabled */
> + ctrl_reg = zynq_fpga_read(priv, MCTRL_OFFSET);
> + zynq_fpga_write(priv, MCTRL_OFFSET, (~MCTRL_PCAP_LPBK_MASK & ctrl_reg));
Why do all of this initialization in probe()? Is it necessary to read
FPGA state()?
>
> +
> + ret = fpga_mgr_register(dev, "Xilinx Zynq FPGA Manager",
> + &zynq_fpga_ops, priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to register FPGA manager");
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> + return ret;
> + }
I would have expected the clock to have been disabled after even a
successful probe.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynq_fpga_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + fpga_mgr_unregister(&pdev->dev);
Your clock management is unbalanced.
Josh
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists