lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444407581.17726.7.camel@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:19:41 -0600
From:	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@....tj>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/60] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge
 register number

On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 14:38 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On one system found strang "no compatible bridge window" warning
> 
> PCI: Claiming 0000:00:01.0: Resource 14: 0002000100000000..000200010fffffff [10220c]
> PCI: Claiming 0000:01:00.0: Resource 1: 0002000100000000..000200010000ffff [100214]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 1 [mem 0x2000100000000-0x200010000ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
> 
> and we already had pref_compat support that add extra pref bit for device
> resource.
> 
> It turns out that pci_resource_compatible()/pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64()
> just check resource with bridge pref mmio register idx 15, and we have put
> resource to use mmio register idx 14 during of_scan_pci_bridge()
> as the bridge does not mmio resource.
> 
> We already fix pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64() to check all bus resources.
> 
> And at the same time, this patch will make resource to consistent sequence
> like other arch or directly from pci_read_bridge_bases(),
> even non-pref mmio is missing, or out of ordering in firmware reporting.
> 
> So hold i = 1 for non pref mmio, and i =2 for pref mmio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

Tested on sparc platforms

Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ