[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009174418.GW3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:44:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] barriers: introduce smp_mb__release_acquire and
update documentation
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:25:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:51:29AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > The corresponding litmus tests are below.
> >
> > How do people feel about including these in memory-barriers.txt? I find
> > them considerably easier to read than our current kernel code + list of
> > possible orderings + wall of text, but there's a good chance that my
> > brain has been corrupted from staring at this stuff for too long.
>
> Your brain is corrupt (but then, so probably is mine, just differently
> so).
>
> I've not yet mastered the knack of reading those things; then again, I
> suspect its not too hard, just not something I've had the time to play
> with.
It does take a bit of practice, but is worth the effort. Of course,
I -would- say that. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists