[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009184941.GN2189@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:49:41 +0300
From: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 43/44] kdbus: Give up on failed fd allocation
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:14:24PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net> wrote:
> > If we failed to allocate a file descriptor, do not try to do it again on
> > the next iteration. There are few chances that we will have success, and
> > we can simplify the algorithm assuming that valid fd numbers are not
> > mixed with -1 values.
>
> Why? This is no a fast-path, and the penalty is accounted on the
> actual culprit (the caller). I don't see why we should optimize for
> that case. If the fd-allocation fails, you clearly did something
> wrong.
I agree, but this is optimization for readability and not for speed.
If we don't care whether fd-allocation failed or not, why should we keep
less readable variant which handles those -1 values mixed with valid fds
numbers?
>
> Thanks
> David
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net>
> > ---
> > ipc/kdbus/message.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/message.c b/ipc/kdbus/message.c
> > index da685049d66c..75e6213e7ed5 100644
> > --- a/ipc/kdbus/message.c
> > +++ b/ipc/kdbus/message.c
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ int kdbus_gaps_install(struct kdbus_gaps *gaps, struct kdbus_pool_slice *slice,
> > {
> > bool incomplete_fds = false;
> > struct kvec kvec;
> > - size_t i, n_fds;
> > + size_t i, n_fds, n_memfds;
> > int ret, *fds;
> >
> > if (!gaps) {
> > @@ -140,25 +140,31 @@ int kdbus_gaps_install(struct kdbus_gaps *gaps, struct kdbus_pool_slice *slice,
> > }
> >
> > fds = kmalloc_array(n_fds, sizeof(*fds), GFP_TEMPORARY);
> > - n_fds = 0;
> > if (!fds)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > /* 1) allocate fds and copy them over */
> >
> > + n_fds = 0; /* n_fds now tracks the number of allocated fds */
> > if (gaps->n_fds > 0) {
> > for (i = 0; i < gaps->n_fds; ++i) {
> > int fd;
> >
> > fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > - if (fd < 0)
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > incomplete_fds = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > WARN_ON(!gaps->fd_files[i]);
> >
> > - fds[n_fds++] = fd < 0 ? -1 : fd;
> > + fds[n_fds++] = fd;
> > }
> >
> > + /* If we couldn't allocate a fd, fill the rest with -1 */
> > + for ( ; i < gaps->n_fds; ++i)
> > + fds[i] = -1;
> > +
> > /*
> > * The file-descriptor array can only be present once per
> > * message. Hence, prepare all fds and then copy them over with
> > @@ -175,18 +181,18 @@ int kdbus_gaps_install(struct kdbus_gaps *gaps, struct kdbus_pool_slice *slice,
> > goto exit;
> > }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < gaps->n_memfds; ++i) {
> > + n_memfds = 0;
> > + for (i = 0; i < gaps->n_memfds && !incomplete_fds; ++i) {
> > int memfd;
> >
> > memfd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > if (memfd < 0) {
> > incomplete_fds = true;
> > - fds[n_fds++] = -1;
> > /* memfds are initialized to -1, skip copying it */
> > - continue;
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > - fds[n_fds++] = memfd;
> > + fds[gaps->n_fds + n_memfds++] = memfd;
> >
> > /*
> > * memfds have to be copied individually as they each are put
> > @@ -208,21 +214,21 @@ int kdbus_gaps_install(struct kdbus_gaps *gaps, struct kdbus_pool_slice *slice,
> >
> > /* 2) install fds now that everything was successful */
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < gaps->n_fds; ++i)
> > - if (fds[i] >= 0)
> > - fd_install(fds[i], get_file(gaps->fd_files[i]));
> > - for (i = 0; i < gaps->n_memfds; ++i)
> > - if (fds[gaps->n_fds + i] >= 0)
> > - fd_install(fds[gaps->n_fds + i],
> > - get_file(gaps->memfd_files[i]));
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_fds; ++i)
> > + fd_install(fds[i], get_file(gaps->fd_files[i]));
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_memfds; ++i)
> > + fd_install(fds[gaps->n_fds + i],
> > + get_file(gaps->memfd_files[i]));
> >
> > ret = 0;
> >
> > exit:
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > for (i = 0; i < n_fds; ++i)
> > - if (fds[i] >= 0)
> > - put_unused_fd(fds[i]);
> > + put_unused_fd(fds[i]);
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_memfds; ++i)
> > + put_unused_fd(fds[gaps->n_fds + i]);
> > + }
> > kfree(fds);
> > *out_incomplete = incomplete_fds;
> > return ret;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists