[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUmNtXZQZQEe=pxqX0bGS2sf15YXfChNMLigmZgzytc+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:28:46 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/36] x86/entry: Micro-optimize compat fast syscall
arg fetch
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> we're following a 32-bit pointer, and the uaccess code isn't smart
>> enough to figure out that the access_ok check isn't needed.
>>
>> This saves about three cycles on a cache-hot fast syscall.
>
> Another request: could you please stick the benchmarking code of the various x86
> system call variants into 'perf bench' - under tools/perf/bench/, so that
> measurements can be done on more hardware and can be reproduced easily?
>
> I'd suggest we dedicate an entirely new benchmark family to it: 'perf bench x86'
> and then have:
>
> perf bench x86 syscall vdso
> perf bench x86 syscall int80
> perf bench x86 syscall vdso-compat
I'll play with this. I'm not too familiar with the perf bench stuff.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists