| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAE40pdfrVsENQeGWqDHS0HP_6S4BBNtp7cYVgjOw2zUNL--1EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:34:33 -0700
From: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] perf callchain: Switch default to 'graph,0.5,caller'
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>
> Which is the most common default found in other similar tools.
Interactive tools, sure, like the perf report TUI.
But this also changes the ordering of the non-interactive tools which
dump stacks: "perf report -n --stdio" and "perf script". The most
common default for dumping stacks is caller. Eg:
# perf report -n --stdio
[...]
16.87% 334 iperf [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
|
--- 0x7f0683ba1ccd
system_call_fastpath
sys_write
vfs_write
do_sync_write
sock_aio_write
do_sock_write.isra.10
inet_sendmsg
copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
[...]
That's upside down. The current default preserves ordering from the
informational line onwards:
# perf report -n --stdio -g fractal,0.5,callee
[...]
16.87% 334 iperf [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
|
--- copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
|
|--64.37%-- inet_sendmsg
| do_sock_write.isra.10
| sock_aio_write
| do_sync_write
| vfs_write
| sys_write
| system_call_fastpath
| 0x7f0683ba1ccd
... Those are just short examples. Another profile I'm working on now
gets really messy on "perf report -n --stdio"; eg:
perf report -n --stdio -g graph,0.5,caller
94.80% 0.10% 2 iperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k]
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
|
|--94.70%-- entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
| |
| |--55.76%-- sys_write
| | |
| | |--55.10%-- vfs_write
| | | |
| | | |--54.39%-- __vfs_write
| | | | |
| | | | --54.34%--
sock_write_iter
| | | | |
| | | |
|--54.19%-- sock_sendmsg
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| |--53.99%-- inet_sendmsg
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |--53.08%-- tcp_sendmsg
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |--17.27%--
copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |--11.41%-- tcp_push_one
| | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | |--11.31%-- tcp_write_xmit
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | |--10.00%--
tcp_transmit_skb
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
|--9.29%-- ip_queue_xmit
| | | |
| | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | |
|--8.69%-- ip_local_out_sk
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| |--8.64%-- ip_output
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | ip_finish_output
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |--8.43%-- ip_finish_output2
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |--6.97%-- __local_bh_enable_ip
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |--6.82%--
do_softirq
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
--6.77%-- do_softirq_own_stack
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
|--6.46%-- __do_softirq
[...]
The current default never gets beyond 5 levels deep. The new default
goes to 25 levels. At least with perf report I can override the
default using "-g". perf script doesn't support that.
Can this patch please preserve the callee ordering for non-interactive
output? (perf script, perf report -n --stdio). Thanks,
Brendan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists