[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32B534D5@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:43:50 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"mel@....ul.ie" <mel@....ul.ie>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
> I remember Kame has already suggested this idea. In my opinion,
> I still think it's better to add a new migratetype or a new zone,
> so both user and kernel could use mirrored memory.
A new zone would be more flexible ... and probably the right long
term solution. But this looks like a very clever was to try out the
feature with a minimally invasive patch.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists