[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8655275.vMqHQfLN9g@wuerfel>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:15 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: add missing of_node_put
On Saturday 10 October 2015 14:30:54 Julia Lawall wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> index 11c54de..432ff34 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
> "max cores %u, capping them\n",
> cpuidx, nr_cpu_ids)) {
> cpuidx = nr_cpu_ids;
> + of_node_put(cpu);
> break;
> }
>
The same for_each_child_of_node() loop has three 'return' statements'
aside from the 'break' statement here. I think you should change your
semantic patch to cover both cases.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists