[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510111942210.6097@nanos>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:58:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
jason@...edaemon.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: irqchip: mxs: prepare driver for HW with
different offsets
Oleksij,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
The proper subject line starts with:
irqchip/mxs:
> Some HW has similar functionality but different register offsets.
> Make sure we can change offsets dynamically.
The patch does way more than that. I told you in V2 already:
> > You forgot to mention the other preparatory changes.
There is still nothing in the changelog.
> +static void __init icoll_add_domain(struct device_node *np,
> + int num)
> +{
> + icoll_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, num,
> + &icoll_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> +
> + if (!icoll_domain)
> + panic("%s: unable add irq domain", np->full_name);
This splitout should be a separate patch with an explanation why you
add
> + irq_set_default_host(icoll_domain);
and
> + set_handle_irq(icoll_handle_irq);
The latter is already done via the DT_MACHINE_START magic. So you
should it remove there, because otherwise that call is just
pointless. See the implementation of set_handle_irq.
> +}
> +
> +static void __iomem * __init icoll_init_iobase(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + void __iomem *icoll_base;
> +
> + icoll_base = of_io_request_and_map(np, 0, np->name);
> + if (!icoll_base)
> + panic("%s: unable to map resource", np->full_name);
> + return icoll_base;
> +}
The panic() is actually a bug fix, because the old code had a
WARN_ON() and then happily dereferenced the NULL pointer. So this
wants to go into a separate patch as well.
> + icoll_add_domain(np, ICOLL_NUM_IRQS);
>
> - icoll_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, ICOLL_NUM_IRQS,
> - &icoll_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> return icoll_domain ? 0 : -ENODEV;
In case of !icoll_domain this return is not reached as you paniced
already. So why would we still check icoll_domain?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists