linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 26/46] richacl: Move everyone@ aces down the acl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1444604337-17651-27-git-send-email-andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:58:37 +0200
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 26/46] richacl: Move everyone@ aces down the acl

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>

The POSIX standard puts processes which are not the owner or a member in
the owning group or which match any ace other then everyone@ on the
other file class.  We only know if a process is in the other class after
processing the entire acl.

Move all everyone@ aces in the acl down in the acl so that at most a
single everyone@ allow ace remains at the end.  Permissions which are
not explicitly allowed are implicitly denied, so an everyone@ deny ace
is unneeded.

The everyone@ aces can be moved down the acl without changing the
permissions that the acl grants.  This transformation simplifies the
following algorithms, and eventually allows us to turn the final
everyone@ allow ace into an entry for the other class.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
---
 fs/richacl_compat.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
index 341e429..4f0acf5 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
@@ -153,3 +153,68 @@ richace_change_mask(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace **ace,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/**
+ * richacl_move_everyone_aces_down  -  move everyone@ aces to the end of the acl
+ * @alloc:	acl and number of allocated entries
+ *
+ * Move all everyone aces to the end of the acl so that only a single everyone@
+ * allow ace remains at the end, and update the mask fields of all aces on the
+ * way.  The last ace of the resulting acl will be an everyone@ allow ace only
+ * if @acl grants any permissions to @everyone.  No @everyone deny aces will
+ * remain.
+ *
+ * This transformation does not alter the permissions that the acl grants.
+ * Having at most one everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl helps us in the
+ * following algorithms.
+ */
+static int
+richacl_move_everyone_aces_down(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
+{
+	struct richace *ace;
+	unsigned int allowed = 0, denied = 0;
+
+	richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) {
+		if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace))
+			continue;
+		if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) {
+			if (richace_is_allow(ace))
+				allowed |= (ace->e_mask & ~denied);
+			else if (richace_is_deny(ace))
+				denied |= (ace->e_mask & ~allowed);
+			else
+				continue;
+			if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, 0))
+				return -1;
+		} else {
+			if (richace_is_allow(ace)) {
+				if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, allowed |
+						(ace->e_mask & ~denied)))
+					return -1;
+			} else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) {
+				if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, denied |
+						(ace->e_mask & ~allowed)))
+					return -1;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	if (allowed & ~RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED) {
+		struct richace *last_ace = ace - 1;
+
+		if (alloc->acl->a_entries &&
+		    richace_is_everyone(last_ace) &&
+		    richace_is_allow(last_ace) &&
+		    richace_is_inherit_only(last_ace) &&
+		    last_ace->e_mask == allowed)
+			last_ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE;
+		else {
+			if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace))
+				return -1;
+			ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+			ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO;
+			ace->e_mask = allowed;
+			ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_EVERYONE_SPECIAL_ID;
+		}
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/