[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444606630.27760.153.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:37:10 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ben Cox <ben@...jojo.co.uk>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ben+patches@...jojo.co.uk,
David L Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] icmp: Fixed bug in raw sockets causing incorrect ICMP
SNMP counter values
Please do not top-post on netdev and/or lkml
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 00:14 +0100, Ben Cox wrote:
> Nice!
>
> That works in my head at least, Sorry about not seeing that fairly
> glaring memory issue there.
No problem, this is why we review patches ;)
>
> Are you sure " skb->transport_header += iphlen; " won't have a knock
> on affect when it's given to NF_HOOK ( as in, would a potential
> userspace program get something it does not expect anymore ) ?
netfilter does not depend on transport_header being set (otherwise as
you can see RAW packets would have problems with netfilter since the
very beginning.
> How does submission work at this point if the above is not a issue
> (apologies if this is already in a FAQ somewhere I missed)?
>
Just send a V2 of the patch, using following title :
[PATCH v2 net] raw: increment correct SNMP counters for ICMP messages
I'll add my 'Acked-by:' after your 'Signed-off-by:'
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists