[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1745884.LUbKvMh2Tj@diego>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:43:27 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: rockchip: Allow the RK3288 SPDIF clocks to change their parent
Hi Sjoerd,
Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 13:35:55 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 17:10 +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015, 15:31:16 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> > > The clock branches leading to sclk_spdif and sclk_spdif_8ch on
> > > RK3288
> > > SoCs only feed those clocks, allow those clocks to change their
> > > parents
> > > all the way up the hierarchy.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
> >
> > Just as comment, if I'm seeing that right, this patch needs "clk:
> > rockchip:
> > handle mux dependency of fractional dividers" and friends [0] to
> > apply and
> > also actually handle the fractional dividers correctly.
> >
> > For the clock change itself:
> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>
> Oh sorry yes, i completely forgot to at that as note on this patch
> (series). These are on top of your series as those are required to make
> things actually work as expected.
>
> Which reminds me, i was wondering how to best move that forward. Could
> you pick this one up to include it in the next round of your series?
> (Otherwise i'm happy to rebase it once you do a v2)
I guess that will depend on how the core series gets handled. Aka if there
needs to be a v2 (depending on the clock maintainers) I can pick that up as
part of it. Otherwise we'll just need to ping the clock-maintainers separately
on this patch if necessary.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists