[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561B56C8.7090403@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:44:24 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme@...a.org.uk>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] irqchip: Convert all alloc/xlate users from of_node
to fwnode
On 10/07/2015 01:36 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Since we now have a generic data structure to express an
> interrupt specifier, convert all hierarchical irqchips that
> are OF based to use a fwnode_handle as part of their alloc
> and xlate (which becomes translate) callbacks.
>
> As most of these drivers have dependencies (they exchange IRQ
> specifiers), change them all in a single, massive patch...
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 18 ++++++----
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 20 ++++++-----
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 49 +++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c | 49 ++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c | 18 +++++++---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-vf610-mscm-ir.c | 42 +++++++++++++++--------
> 13 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> index e00eb39..5a7e47c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> @@ -177,54 +177,57 @@ static struct irq_chip exynos_pmu_chip = {
> #endif
> };
>
> -static int exynos_pmu_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *domain,
> - struct device_node *controller,
> - const u32 *intspec,
> - unsigned int intsize,
> - unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> - unsigned int *out_type)
> +static int exynos_pmu_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + unsigned long *hwirq,
> + unsigned int *type)
> {
> - if (domain->of_node != controller)
> - return -EINVAL; /* Shouldn't happen, really... */
> - if (intsize != 3)
> - return -EINVAL; /* Not GIC compliant */
> - if (intspec[0] != 0)
> - return -EINVAL; /* No PPI should point to this domain */
> + if (is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode)) {
> + if (fwspec->param_count != 3)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - *out_hwirq = intspec[1];
> - *out_type = intspec[2];
> - return 0;
> + /* No PPI should point to this domain */
> + if (fwspec->param[0] != 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *hwirq = fwspec->param[1];
> + *type = fwspec->param[2];
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> static int exynos_pmu_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> unsigned int virq,
> unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> {
> - struct of_phandle_args *args = data;
> - struct of_phandle_args parent_args;
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> + struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> int i;
>
> - if (args->args_count != 3)
> + if (fwspec->param_count != 3)
> return -EINVAL; /* Not GIC compliant */
> - if (args->args[0] != 0)
> + if (fwspec->param[0] != 0)
> return -EINVAL; /* No PPI should point to this domain */
>
> - hwirq = args->args[1];
> + hwirq = fwspec->param[1];
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> &exynos_pmu_chip, NULL);
>
> - parent_args = *args;
> - parent_args.np = domain->parent->of_node;
Hmm, here removes the of_node, but I think we still
need to convert it in the first patch, or will break
the git bisect.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists