[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1444635981-25552-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:46:21 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] linux/compiler.h: fix stale comment on {READ,WRITE}_ONCE
Commit 7bd3e239d6c6 ("locking: Remove atomicy checks from
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE") removed said warning.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index c836eb2dc44d..1dd0034e15e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -237,8 +237,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
* In contrast to ACCESS_ONCE these two macros will also work on aggregate
* data types like structs or unions. If the size of the accessed data
* type exceeds the word size of the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits)
- * READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy and print a
- * compile-time warning.
+ * READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy.
*
* Their two major use cases are: (1) Mediating communication between
* process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists