[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012093033.GC16124@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:30:34 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/7] atomics: Add test for atomic operations with
_relaxed variants
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:49:29PM +0100, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Some atomic operations now have _{relaxed, acquire, release} variants,
> this patch then adds some trivial tests for two purpose:
>
> 1. test the behavior of these new operations in single-CPU
> environment.
> 2. make their code generated before we actually use them somewhere,
> so that we can examine their assembly code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/atomic64_test.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
FWIW: this was useful to me whilst developing the arm64 relaxed atomic
implementation. Could you extend it to include the recently queued inc/dec
variants too?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists