[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444642554.31951.0.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:35:54 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: use memblock_is_memory
On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 00:30 +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> The <linux/memblock.h> provides memblock_is_memory() function that
> tries to find a given physical address in the memblock.memory.regions.
> Let's use this function instead of direct coding of the same functionality.
Are you sure it implements exactly the same logic?
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 22d94c3..85b462b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -82,11 +82,9 @@ int page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
> return pfn < max_pfn;
> #else
> unsigned long paddr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> - struct memblock_region *reg;
>
> - for_each_memblock(memory, reg)
> - if (paddr >= reg->base && paddr < (reg->base + reg->size))
> - return 1;
> + if (memblock_is_memory(paddr))
> + return 1;
> return 0;
Why not just return memblock_is_memory(paddr) ?
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists