linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <561B8AA6.50503@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:25:42 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for
 mic detection

On 2015년 10월 12일 19:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> 
> On 2015년 10월 12일 17:45, Charles Keepax wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
>>>>> Add additional bindings to allow configuration of the system specific
>>>>> microphone detection settings.
>>>>
>>>> This all seems pretty much fine to me - the things it is controlling are
>>>> fairly specific to the way the former Wolfson devices do, they only
>>>> really make sense with a fairly particular algorithm which isn't widely
>>>> implemented.
>>>
>>> Is that an Ack?
>>
>> I am guessing Mark is slightly hesitant to ack as he probably
>> doesn't want to add reviewing all our jack detection bindings to
>> his already fairly sizable work load and doing so here likely
>> means it will be expected in the future. From talking to people at
>> LinuxCon it looks like it is pretty unlikely the DT maintainers
>> will be acking individual bindings as well, basically they are
>> only really looking at major/framework things and leaving the
>> rest to subsystem maintainers.
>>
>> Given that these patches only touch MFD/Extcon and extcon
>> is a subsystem designed to handle things like jack detection
>> isn't it really sufficient that you and Chanwoo have looked this
>> and are happy with it? Otherwise I really don't see anyway to
>> move this forward and would appreciate any suggestions?
> 
> I'm positive about your patches. After receiving the ack from MFD maintainer
> I want to apply this patch-set on extcon git repository.
> 
> Also, I reviewed this patch on previous patch[1].
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/81

As you said, this patch touch MFD and EXTCON subsystem.
If you get the Ack or agreement from MFD maintainer,
I'm willing to apply it on extcon git.

Also, If this patch dont receive the additional ack message
unitl the end of this week, I'll merge patch1-3 on extcon-next branch
for Linux 4.4.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/