linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: return probe deferred status on dev_pm_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB3z_RpBxhuiCXO00g1zgNvHFZx+cn4Dx6RYhQHtkFjW4L0nwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:15:54 +0100
From:	Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@...il.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: return probe deferred status on dev_pm_domain_attach

Hi Wolfram,

On 12 October 2015 at 08:23, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> Hi Kiera,
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:39:31PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> A change of return status was introduced in commit 3fffd1283927
>> ("i2c: allow specifying separate wakeup interrupt in device tree")
>
> Thanks for catching this!

NP : Saw it when re-basing my other series.

>> The commit prevents the defer status being passed up the call stack
>> appropriately when dev_pm_domain_attach returns -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> To fix we change this back to the original return status;
>
> What about going to the error path?

Sounds reasonable :D


>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@...il.com>
>
> Please add a "Fixes: <sha1>" tag here.

Sure.

>
>    Wolfram
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/