[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561B1730.9050408@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:13:04 +0900
From: Tony Cho <tony.cho@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <kholmanskikh.s.s@...il.com>
CC: <johnny.kim@...el.com>, <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
<chris.park@...el.com>, <glen.lee@...el.com>, <leo.kim@...el.com>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: staging: wilc1000: WILC1000_DYNAMICALLY_ALLOCATE_MEMROY
On 2015년 10월 09일 03:47, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 09:29:35PM +0300, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I noticed that drivers/staging/wilc1000/Kconfic defines:
>>
>> config WILC1000_DYNAMICALLY_ALLOCATE_MEMROY
>> bool "Dynamically allocate memory in real time"
>> ---help---
>> This choice supports dynamic allocation of the memory
>> for the receive buffer. The driver will allocate the RX buffer
>> when it is required.
>>
>>
>> "MEMROY" looks suspicious. Is it a typo (MEMORY?) or by intent?
> Probably a typo, but be sure to see if it lines up with what the code
> expects before changing anything.
>
> Ideally in the end this option should be removed as the driver should
> only do dynamic allocation, no static allocation should be needed.
I agree with Greg's opinion. The team is now restructuring the driver and they will be removed and changed.
Thanks for your valuable opinion,
Tony.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists