linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return -ENOMEM on error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1444663735.3494.58.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:28:55 -0400
From:	"Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@...il.com>
To:	Tillmann Heidsieck <theidsieck@...nox.de>
Cc:	linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] atm: iphase: Fix misleading indention and return
 -ENOMEM on error

On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 21:47 +0200, Tillmann Heidsieck wrote:
> this series fixes two of them. The if(); warning would require
> restructuring the code to a larger extend. Beyond this there remains a
> whooping number of > 2k checkpatch.pl warnings and errors each. Those
> can be grouped into 
...
> Generally I would not mind cleaning all this up for those who have to
> make functional changes to the driver. However, I would like to know
> from the maintainers if such an afford would be welcome or not.

It doesn't bother me if you do this.  I can review it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/