[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012154715.GF4238@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:47:15 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with
multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:00:45AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Does this look like a step in right direction?
> static const struct regulator_desc arizona_ldo1_hc = {
> - .name = "LDO1",
No, you definitely shouldn't be doing this - the regulator names should
reflect the names the device has in the datasheet to aid people in going
from software to the hardware and back again. They shouldn't be
dynamically generated at runtime. If you need to namespace by device
provide an interface which explicitly namespaces by device rather than
hacking it into another interface, the usual thing is to use the struct
device as the context.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists