[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPc7b4H8qFLRLR2jecA74BPJ-SNfY-GtfTVf=mfzrEeCtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:33:59 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: of: add missing of_node_put
2015-10-10 21:30 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>:
>
> for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so
> a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
>
> for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> (
> return child;
> |
> + of_node_put(child);
> ? return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> index 499e437..f9d77b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ int of_regulator_match(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
> dev_err(dev,
> "failed to parse DT for regulator %s\n",
> child->name);
> + of_node_put(child);
This looks good.
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> match->of_node = of_node_get(child);
But what about 'break' few lines below? The reference from last
of_get_next_child() should be also dropped because... or we should
remove this of_node_get() call.
How about fixing also usage of for_each_available_child_of_node() in
regulator_of_get_init_data()?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists