linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas tree order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:30:32 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
	Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@...il.com>,
	Karsten Merker <merker@...ian.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas
 tree order

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:51 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > > Why?
>> >
>> > It was already discussed in the thread for a previous version,
>> > please
>> > refer to that.
>>
>> Fine, but surely that should be in the commit message, to prevent
>> others
>> like myself repeatedly asking the same question?
>
> Fair point. Irina?

No, let's just leave poor includes alone.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/