linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 0/2] Add DA9021 support to the existing DA9052/53 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:42:18 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 0/2]  Add DA9021 support to the existing DA9052/53
 driver

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:52:00PM +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
> On 09 October 2015 12:36 Mark Brown wrote:

> > Are there any dependencies between the two patches?

> Nope. 
> I just thought because they were for MFD and regulators I would separate them.
> Do you want me to merge them into a single patch and re-send?

No, the point is that if you send a series the assumption will normally
be that later patches depend on earlier patches so a cross tree merge or
carrying things in a non-default tree is required to get everything
integrated.

If there are no dependencies it's clearer to just send each patch
individually.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)