[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561BF252.3090607@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:48:02 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/36] x86/entry/64/compat: After SYSENTER, move STI
after the NT fixup
On 10/09/2015 09:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Anyway, it's still a win, but I'll keep playing. There may be even
> better ways to do this.
Such as this?
Drop OR, check for cleared IF here:
testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT, EFLAGS(%rsp)
jnz sysenter_fix_flags
testl $X86_EFLAGS_IF, EFLAGS(%rsp)
jz sysenter_fix_flags
sysenter_flags_fixed:
and make sysenter_fix_flags code set IF in addition to TF clearing.
This way, we don't even have an unconditional RMW op.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists