[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012175459.GD1113@lerouge>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:55:01 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:52:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:45:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz
> > > and isolcpus I think we can.
> >
> > Could we also add the rcu settings?
>
> I thought that I already had. What am I still missing?
>
> > > task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name.
> >
> > no_os_cpus?
> >
> > os_free_cpus?
>
> os_jitter_free_cpus?
>
> clean_cpus?
>
> quiet_cpus?
>
> I have no problem with any of the names proposed thus far, but obviously
> could not resist the urge to propose a few more.
I moved forward quite slowly with nohz full over the years but at least I'm proud
that this subsystem introduced some of the most interesting naming challenges!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists