[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012185255.GC26883@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:52:55 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra: delete unneeded of_node_put
On 10/09, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_put on each iteration, so
> putting an of_node_put before a continue results in a double put.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
>
> for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_get(child)
> * of_node_put(child);
> ...
> * continue;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists