[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012225327.GF27164@dastard>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:53:27 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm, dax: fix DAX deadlocks
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 04:58:49PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The following two locking commits in the DAX code:
>
> commit 843172978bb9 ("dax: fix race between simultaneous faults")
> commit 46c043ede471 ("mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX")
>
> introduced a number of deadlocks and other issues which need to be fixed
> for the v4.3 kernel. The list of issues in DAX after these commits (some
> newly introduced by the commits, some preexisting) can be found here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/602
>
> This undoes most of the changes introduced by those two commits,
> essentially returning us to the DAX locking scheme that was used in v4.2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
I've run this through some testing, the deadlocks aren't present and
there don't appear to be any new regressions, so IMO this is fine to
go to Linus.
Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists