[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2d6d59c2b0654872a32a9b63874b750e6b808cb5.1444713966.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:57:13 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
skannan@...eaurora.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: Drop redundant check for inactive policies
We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
---
Resending as a separate patch.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 58aabe0f2d2c..4fa2215cc6ec 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -843,18 +843,11 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- /* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
- if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy))) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto unlock_policy_rwsem;
- }
-
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
-unlock_policy_rwsem:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
unlock:
put_online_cpus();
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists