linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas tree order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1F3AC3675D538145B1661F571FE1805F2F0FE45A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:42:53 +0000
From:	"Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
CC:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@...il.com>,
	Karsten Merker <merker@...ian.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Purdila, Octavian" <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas
 tree order



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@...il.com]
> Sent: 12 October, 2015 19:31
> To: Bastien Nocera
> Cc: Mark Rutland; Tirdea, Irina; Aleksei Mamlin; Karsten Merker; linux-input@...r.kernel.org; Purdila, Octavian; lkml;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas tree order
> 
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:51 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> > > Why?
> >> >
> >> > It was already discussed in the thread for a previous version,
> >> > please
> >> > refer to that.
> >>
> >> Fine, but surely that should be in the commit message, to prevent
> >> others
> >> like myself repeatedly asking the same question?
> >
> > Fair point. Irina?
> 
> No, let's just leave poor includes alone.
> 

OK, will drop this :)

Thanks,
Irina

> --
> Dmitry