[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6820669.agSbTbzqFV@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:57:53 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pxa: remove incorrect __init annotation on pxa27x_set_pwrmode
On Monday 12 October 2015 23:07:28 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> > The z2 in particular never did, except in the powerdown handler. So if it
> > is unable to wake up reliably from DEEPSLEEP, that may be a reason to use
> > that flag only in the poweroff function but not during normal operation.
> My first thought was :
> This flag's only use is for Suspend to RAM. There might be special
> wirings where the voltage to the RAM is provided out of SYS_EN pin
> control, and therefore PWRMODE_DEEPSLEEP is possible. But the most
> common pattern would be a PMIC, providing voltage to the DRAM through
> Vcc_Mem.
>
> But having a closer look, you're right, I have misunderstood the way z2 poweroff
> was designed. The setting of poweroff to PWRMODE_DEEPSLEEP +
> pxa27x_cpu_pm_enter() is a whole, it is the closest to a platform halt where no
> external chip handles the poweroff phase, and memory is shutdown in deep sleep.
>
> Therefore I'll drop Thierry's patch (which would actually break suspend to RAM I
> think) and take yours.
Ok, sounds good. thanks!
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists