linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c6ea0362f5336d9bc8acbfbd7ceae06@mail.ncrmnt.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0300
From:	Andrew <andrew@...mnt.org>
To:	Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, arve@...roid.com,
	Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
	Laura Abbott <laura@...bott.name>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	romlem@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	a.makarov@...ule.ru, a.bogdanova@...ule.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion

On 2015-10-12 21:39, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 05:35:41 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Laura Abbott 
>> <labbott@...oraproject.org> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> +       ion {
>>> +               compatbile = "linux,ion";
>>> +               #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +               #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +               ion-system-heap {
>>> +                       linux,ion-heap-id = <0>;
>>> +                       linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_SYSTEM_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>> +                       linux,ion-heap-name = "system";
>> 
>> How does this vary across platforms? Is all of this being pushed down
>> to DT, because there is no coordination of this at the kernel ABI
>> level across platforms. In other words, why can't heap 0 be hardcoded
>> as system heap in the driver. It seems to me any 1 of these 3
>> properties could be used to derive the other 2.
> 
> The heap-id<->heap-type mapping isn't necessarily 1:1.  As Laura
> indicated elsewhere on this thread, a given heap might need to be
> contiguous on one platform but not on another.  In that case you just
> swap out the heap-type here and there's no need for userspace to 
> change.
> 
> The heap-name, OTOH, could be derived from the heap-id, which is what 
> we
> hackishly do here [1] and here[2].

By the way, since we agreed that heap id and heap type mappings
are not 1:1 - we have a problem with the current API.

In userspace we currently have this:

int ion_alloc(int fd, size_t len, size_t align, unsigned int heap_mask,
               unsigned int flags, ion_user_handle_t *handle);

We do not specify here what TYPE of heap we want the allocation to come 
from.
This may lead to very unpleasant stuff when porting from one platfrom to 
another.

But, manual heap id control is VERY neat, since it allows to cover a lot 
of
platform-specific cases, where allocating memory from certain heaps can
yield performance boost.

In other words - maybe we should specify both suitable heap types and 
heap ids?

> [1]
> https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.14/tree/drivers/staging/android/ion/msm/msm_ion.c?h=msm-3.14#n53
> [2]
> https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.14/tree/drivers/staging/android/ion/msm/msm_ion.c?h=msm-3.14#n398
> 
> 
> -Mitch

-- 
Regards,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/