[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013090654.GR3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:06:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: byungchul.park@....com
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yuyang.du@...el.com, pjt@...gle.com, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: make fair sched class can handle the cgroup
change by other class
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:16:23PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
>
> Original fair sched class can handle the cgroup change occured within its
> class with task_move_group_fair(), but there is no way to know it if the
> change happened outside. This patch makes the fair sched class can handle
> the change of cgroup which happened even at other sched class.
>
> Additionally, it makes sched_move_task() more flexable so that any other
> sched class can add task_move_group_xx() callback easily in future when
> it is needed.
I don't get the problem... when !fair, set_task_rq() will do what needs
doing.
The only reason we need task_move_group_fair() is the extra accounting
required when we actually _are_ of the fair class, it needs to
unaccount, move and reaccount.
If we're not fair, the whole switched_from/to stuff should do that for
us, no?
So please explain the problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists